Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 10, 2026 at 7:10 am in reply to: Is Apple getting more serious about photography with macOS 27? #152217
Stewart Logie
ParticipantDoes this explain why I cannot correct chromatic aberration on my Canon 5R test file? It has bad purple green aberration in one area of high contrast, but using the tool in Nitro destroys color in the rest of the image before the aberration is removed.
October 9, 2026 at 4:15 pm in reply to: Is Apple getting more serious about photography with macOS 27? #152212Stewart Logie
ParticipantOne thing I noticed with Nitro and RAW 9 is that lens profiles don’t seem to be available on “supported” (Canon R5) cameras. This is the case even if I choose R8 as the converter. Unsupported cameras (Canon R5m2), with only RAW 8 as a choice, offer a lens profile.
October 5, 2026 at 5:48 pm in reply to: Is Apple getting more serious about photography with macOS 27? #152197Stewart Logie
ParticipantI tested a 8000 ISO image on a (RAW 9) supported camera (Canon R5) and I have to say I am very impressed. Maybe even superior to DxO’s XD3 in Photolab 10. Will have to try more examples, but this is very promising indeed.
Stewart Logie
ParticipantI see the noise reduction in the Mac version where you indicate, but not in the iPad version.
Stewart Logie
ParticipantI did some further experimentation. One step that I did not mention was that I had imported into Nitro a keyword list in txt format that had been exported by digikam. Its content and hierarchy look fine in Nitro. I now notice that when I attached keywords with that list selected they did not stick, even when I went to another image and came back. Closing Nitro and reopening with that imported txt file seemed to cause the keywords to stick. They now appear in the xmp sidecar file.
Thanks, Stewart
-
AuthorPosts
