Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
You can zoom the viewer whenever you want to more precisely place the dots. On an iPad, you can just two-finger pinch – there is no special mode. There doesn’t need to be.
1. I am able to reproduce the problem with perspective and masks. But not in every case. What works is: apply guided perspective and then add a mask. Adding a mask first and then perspective (which is a bit unusual IMO) will shift. Also, the vertical / horizontal sliders appear to mess up the mask too. Thanks for reporting the bug.
2. I don’t know about #2 – it could be a situation when the app is simply confused.
3. Rotating can be slow if the window is large. You can use the straighten tool to avoid this problem.
4. Guided Perspective already allows you to zoom in. While I can imagine transparent or thinner lines might help, they may be invisible in certain images. When I have made the lines thinner in the past, people ask for thicker ones. When they are thicker, people want them thinner. /shrugHi Erin,
Crop should definitely not stick like you are describing. Does it happen if you quit and reopen the app? Does it happen if try cropping an image that has no other adjustments on it (make sure it doesn’t have straighten when you run the test)?
Also, you are running an old version of Nitro – the current version is 2026.5.
As Jerry says, there is no “import” in Nitro. So if you drag 30 images, you are telling it you want to open 30 individual editor windows.
If you force quit the app, and reopen it, it should not try to reopen those.
Ed, perhaps you have assigned a “camera preset” in Nitro. Those automatically get applied when you open an image in Edit.
To find out, you can go to the Preset interface, and click the little camera icon at the bottom.
It’s hard to tell from your description, but it seems most likely that you don’t have a RAW image. Is it possible that you changed the camera setting to shoot JPEG? If not, when you look at Info in Nitro, what is the file extension and is there a RAW badge?
Thanks!
First bis : in case of non supported cameras do you have any possibility to extend the comptatibility with RawBridge ?
I don’t know yet – I’m sure I can add new cameras, and I think we will get some of the improvements. Still needs investigation, but I’m hopeful.
Second : any possibilities of fine tuning on your side ? If yes what are the types of control ?
Most of the tuning controls are still available.
Third : any thoughts concerning the monochrom raws ?
No idea at all.
Last one : is it good ? ( comparing to Dxo’s )
No idea how it compares to DxO. I do see noticeable improvements in noise reduction with some high ISO Canon RAWs that I have.
Here is the list of cameras in the first developer beta (it’s small but the developer beta is only for a small set of people):
Canon EOS 1500D
Canon EOS 2000D
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Canon EOS 6D
Canon EOS 6D Mark II
Canon EOS R
Canon EOS R1
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R50
Canon EOS R5C
Canon EOS R6
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Canon EOS R8
Canon EOS RP
Canon EOS Rebel T7
Canon R100
Fujifilm X-T5
Fujifilm X-T50
Leica D-Lux 8
Nikon D750
Nikon D850
Nikon Z 6 2
Nikon Z fc
Nikon Z50
Panasonic LUMIX DC-G100
Panasonic LUMIX DC-G110
Panasonic LUMIX DC-S5M2
Panasonic LUMIX DC-S5M2X
Sony Alpha ILCE-6100
Sony Alpha ILCE-6100A
Sony Alpha ILCE-6400
Sony Alpha ILCE-6400A
Sony Alpha ILCE-6700
Sony Alpha ILCE-7 II
Sony Alpha ILCE-7C
Sony Alpha ILCE-7C II
Sony Alpha ILCE-7M IV
Sony Alpha ILCE-7M3
Sony Alpha ILCE-7M4
Sony Alpha ILCE-7R III
Sony Alpha ILCE-7R III A
Sony Alpha ILCE-7R V
Sony Alpha ILCE-7S III
Sony Alpha ZV-E10No. That’s not what will happen. Apple has made RAW 9 an “opt-in” feature. That’s because it is much slower than the existing decoder, and because images can change appearance. They know what they are doing!
I haven’t decided on the details of how RAW 9 will work with Nitro (or RAW Power – I hope both apps will get that feature), but I will not change the decode of existing images without people agreeing to it.
I suppose it’s possible that other apps would just switch their customers to RAW 9, but I won’t.
First, RAW 9 only runs on OS 27, so Intel Macs are out of luck.
Overall, RAW 9 looks great and I will definitely enable it. But, it has higher resource requirements, including memory. That means that some iOS / iPadOS devices may not be good candidates to use RAW 9. Since RAW 9 changes the appearance of images, that complicates matters further, especially when using iCloud or other synching between devices that can run RAW 9, and those that cannot (e.g., Intel Macs). You don’t want to be in a position where you edit an image on one device and it looks different when you open it on another device.
